FOR AI, PRODUCT, AND LOCALIZATION TEAMS
Multilingual AI to Power Accurate Model Evaluation
Measure, validate, and improve multilingual model quality with domain-expert evaluation, human-in-the-loop review, and benchmark creation, delivering trustworthy, repeatable results across 100+ languages.
The Lilt Difference
Human + AI Evaluation Pipelines
Combine automated scoring with optional expert human review to validate precision, recall, contextual accuracy, and fluency across multilingual outputs.
Cross-Lingual Consistency Testing
Run evaluations that measure linguistic consistency, relevance, and tone across languages, domains, and modalities—not just synthetic benchmarks.
Continuous Quality Feedback Loops
Feed error analysis and evaluation signals directly back into model workflows to improve robustness, reduce failure rates, and strengthen outputs over time.
Flexible, KPI-Aligned Metrics
Measure what matters with customizable evaluation criteria—such as fluency, relevance, factual accuracy, and bias reduction—mapped to your internal quality standards.
Use Cases
Model Benchmarking and Comparison
Compare models side-by-side using multilingual benchmarks to evaluate accuracy, relevance, and consistency across languages and domains.
Human-in-the-Loop Review
Layer expert linguistic evaluation on top of automated scoring for outputs that require cultural accuracy, domain precision, or stylistic alignment.
Continuous Model Improvement
Feed multilingual evaluation data back into fine-tuning or RLHF workflows to iteratively improve model performance.
Localization Quality Assessment
Evaluate fluency, fidelity, and production-readiness based on real content—not BLEU-style metrics that miss nuance, meaning, and intent.
Risk and Error Analysis
Identify systemic weaknesses by language or content type and reduce deployment risk through targeted remediation before release.